昨日、発信した以下の記事を、日米欧、否、世界中の左派メディアに対して発信する。

彼らの論理が、いかにでたらめだったかが告げられている事にも気づいていないのである。

彼らが、共産党一党独裁国家であり、習近平の独裁国家であるだけではなく、その本質が古来、「底知れぬ悪」と「まことしやかな嘘」の国だった中国の工作の対象であり、もはや中国＝CCPの代理人であることは、朝日新聞等やNHK等のテレビメディア、最も顕著なのは、沖縄の報道を支配している二紙が歴然たる事実である事を証明している。
世界中の左派メディアも、彼らと似たり寄ったりである事も、今や歴然たる事実である。
CCPの工作の最大対象であるといっても過言ではない事を露呈している国連。
CCPの別働部隊と言っても全く過言ではないダボス会議と、その主催者であるクラウス・シュワブと、これに嬉々として参列して来た西側の愚劣な経済人達。

読者はご存じの、「この世界にいるもう一人の私」であるJ.M.G.ル・クレジオ。
彼が出世作である「逃亡の書」で表現した、見開きページ全部を使用しての、罵倒語の羅列に倣って、ここでは英語で発信する。

A Court Ruling Shattered the Anti-Nuclear Narrative — And Exposed the Asahi Shimbun as a Pillar of Progressive Disinformation

Japan’s Courts Proved Nuclear Accidents Preventable — Why Progressive Media Still Cling to Anti-Nuclear Myths

When Facts Collide with Ideology: How Japan’s Progressive Media Ignored a Court Ruling That Undermined Anti-Nuclear Dogma

The Anti-Nuclear Movement Disguised as Journalism — Asahi Shimbun and the Collapse of Progressive Moral Authority

The Verdict Progressive Media Didn’t Want You to Notice: Nuclear Accidents Are Preventable

Science, Courts, and Reality vs. Progressive Anti-Nuclear Ideology — A Case Study from Japan

Japan Nuclear Court Ruling Exposes Progressive Media Bias — The Anti-Nuclear Argument Falls Apart

The Moral Collapse of Progressive Anti-Nuclear Journalism — Lessons from Japan’s Courts

A Court Ruling Shattered the Anti-Nuclear Narrative — And Exposed Progressive Media Disinformation in Japan

For years, progressive media in Japan have insisted that nuclear power is inherently unsafe, that nuclear accidents are unavoidable, and that absolute opposition is therefore a moral imperative.
This narrative has been exported to the West as a cautionary tale—frequently cited, rarely examined.

A Japanese court ruling has now dismantled that foundation.

The court explicitly recognized that the nuclear accident in question could have been prevented.
This single judicial determination destroys the core premise of anti-nuclear absolutism: the claim that nuclear accidents are, by their nature, inevitable.
If an accident is preventable, then nuclear power itself is not the moral abomination progressive ideology has portrayed it to be.

Yet Japan’s leading progressive newspaper, the Asahi Shimbun, reacted not with self-reflection, but with triumphalism—filling four full pages with attacks on the state and industry, as if the verdict vindicated its long-running campaign.
It did not.

The ruling did the opposite.
It exposed that the anti-nuclear position promoted for years by Asahi Shimbun and allied opposition politicians was not grounded in science, engineering, or law, but in pseudo-moralism masquerading as journalism.

While Japan’s media-driven moral panic dismantled its own nuclear research capacity, other nations drew very different conclusions.
South Korea expanded its nuclear program.
China accelerated it dramatically, establishing nuclear engineering departments at more than fifty universities and positioning itself for global leadership.

This is not merely a Japanese media failure.
It is a warning to Western audiences accustomed to consuming “progressive” narratives uncritically:
when ideology overrides facts, journalism ceases to inform—and begins to mislead.

The court has spoken.
The myth has collapsed.
What remains is a reckoning long overdue.