Based on a dialogue between Masahiro Miyazaki and Shi Ping, this essay examines the theory that the Wuhan virus may have leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the suspicions surrounding female researcher Huang Yanling, the Chinese Academy of Sciences’ notice to strengthen virus management, and the possibility of early hospital-acquired infections at Wuhan Central Hospital. It also criticizes the Japanese media for failing to report on the concealment-prone nature of the Chinese Communist Party regime.

2020-06-03
A theory has emerged that a female researcher named Huang Yanling, who worked at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, may have been the first infected person.
It is said that the virus leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology due to some kind of mistake by this woman.
The following is from a dialogue book between Mr. Masahiro Miyazaki, one of the world’s foremost experts on China, whom it is no exaggeration to call the living Tadao Umesao of our time, and Mr. Shi Ping.
Mr. Shi Ping was born Chinese, graduated from Peking University, and after that, while studying at Kobe University, visited Arashiyama at the invitation of a friend, where he was struck by divine revelation and naturalized as a Japanese citizen.
As I have already written, I encountered him several years ago at Tofukuji Temple when the autumn leaves were at their peak, exchanged words with him, and exchanged business cards.
This essay proves that the Japanese broadcasting stations, beginning with the Asahi Shimbun and NHK, are not even fragments of journalists.
They are “the unforgiven.”
The preface is omitted.
Is the Rumor That It Was a Biological and Chemical Weapon Close to the Truth?
Miyazaki
Changing the subject, recently there has been a lingering rumor that this “Wuhan virus” may be a biological weapon.
The first to suggest that it might be a biological weapon was the Pentagon, that is, the United States Department of Defense, but it avoided making a definitive statement.
However, Luc Montagnier, the discoverer of the AIDS virus and a Nobel Prize winner in Physiology or Medicine, stated that “the novel coronavirus accidentally leaked from a virus research institute in Wuhan, China, and was an artificially manipulated virus.”
Even if it was not a biological weapon, the possibility of human error on China’s part became high.
There is a Chinese lab, that is, a research institute, about 15 kilometers away from the seafood market said to be the source of the pathogen.
This is a fact.
Another lab is only 3 kilometers away.
However, American experts say there is no evidence whatsoever to establish a connection between that research institute and the seafood market.
Still, the fact that there was a lab near the seafood market has invited all kinds of speculation.
This is because the mystery is said to be the fact that “the Wuhan virus propagates quickly.”
Therefore, many people concerned suspected that this virus might be artificial.
Shi Ping
The Chinese government insists that bats sold at the seafood market were not the source of the “Wuhan virus.”
Then where was the source?
One possibility is the lab that Mr. Miyazaki just pointed out.
It is called the “Wuhan Institute of Virology,” and it is a well-known research institute locally.
It belongs to the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army is involved with it.
The Chinese word “bingdu” means “virus.”
So, on the Chinese internet, the rumor spread that the virus had leaked from the Institute of Virology.
On the Chinese internet, people often carry out something like “human flesh searches,” do they not?
So, who was the first infected person?
As a result of an investigation on the internet, the story emerged that a female researcher named Huang Yanling, who worked at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, may have been the first infected person.
The theory emerged that the “Wuhan virus” leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology due to some kind of mistake by this woman.
The Beijing-based “Beijing News” heard that rumor and interviewed the Wuhan Institute of Virology in order to confirm the facts.
Its aim was to clear up the “dark rumor” that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was the source.
Therefore, rather than confirming the facts, the reporter’s purpose was to erase the rumor on the internet.
Naturally, during the interview, the reporter brought up the story of the researcher named Ms. Huang.
How, then, did the person in charge of the Wuhan Institute of Virology answer?
He said, “I do not know whether such a person, Ms. Huang, was at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.”
However, from the internet, an overwhelming number of opinions were sent to the institute saying that this answer was strange.
It was not a research institute with thousands or tens of thousands of researchers, but at most one with a little over a hundred people, so it was inexplicable to say, “I do not know whether that person A is there or not.”
As the investigation continued, in fact, this person’s name was found on the research institute’s homepage.
It was listed on the page introducing each researcher.
However, strangely, although the name was there, her career history and other details had been deleted.
So the Wuhan Institute of Virology issued another statement saying, “This researcher certainly existed. However, she is no longer here. She has been assigned to another region.”
Then it announced, “Ms. Huang is still well. She has not contracted the novel coronavirus,” and became desperate to cancel the rumor.
But contrary to the intention of the institute, the rumor spread even further.
Internet users poked holes in this statement.
They said, “If this person is alive and has gone to another region, then if she herself responded to an interview and denied the rumor, everything would be over, would it not?”
However, this person has not appeared at all, and not even a statement from her has come out.
Depending on the case, she may have died from coronavirus infection.
Miyazaki
She may have been erased.
Silencing people is also one of the Chinese Communist Party’s specialties, is it not?
Shi Ping
Moreover, while this rumor was spreading, the Chinese Academy of Sciences issued a strange notice through the media to the relevant departments.
The content of that notice was that “all virus-related research institutes and laboratories nationwide must strengthen virus management.”
The fact that they said to strengthen it, and so on, can be interpreted as meaning that there had been some sort of deficiency up to that point, can it not?
In other words, I think it is reasonable to judge that this was done because there had been some case in which a management deficiency allowed something to leak.
Was it not precisely because the government recognized that there had been some sort of deficiency that it issued this strange notice?
Whether or not the “Wuhan virus” was a biological weapon.
I am not a specialist, so I do not know, but judging from various circumstantial pieces of evidence, it is probably true that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was handling the virus for some purpose.
And although the cause is not clear, I think it is more reasonable to believe that it leaked from that institute.
A researcher at the institute became infected with the “Wuhan virus,” and through close contact, transmitted it to another person.
The most likely possibility is that this researcher went to a hospital and transmitted it to other doctors.
Then the doctors transmitted it to other patients……
As you know, there were eight people who posted online that pneumonia had broken out and were summoned by the police.
All eight of them were doctors.
I think the first infections were probably “hospital-acquired infections.”
Miyazaki
Which hospital was it?
Shi Ping
I think it was Wuhan Central Hospital.
It spread within Wuhan City from doctors to ordinary patients.
Miyazaki
So that is why doctors died in the early stages.
That was the case with Li Wenliang, the doctor in Wuhan City who had sounded the alarm on the internet at an early stage.
I did not understand why doctors died so early, but so that was the reason.
It was said that the source of the virus outbreak was rats or bats sold at the seafood market, but that must be a complete fabrication.
And the Wuhan city authorities deliberately shut down that market, but that means it was a strategy to enhance the visual effect.
In any case, the rat and bat theory has become extremely suspicious.
In that case, SARS, the severe acute respiratory syndrome that occurred in 2003, was said to have been caused by civets, but that too is quite suspicious.
Shi Ping
That is right.
To be honest, Chinese people do not eat bats that much.
Miyazaki
You mean some people may eat them?
Shi Ping
They eat dogs and snakes, but I have never heard of people eating bats.
Miyazaki
For example, when you go to Vietnam, people always eat rats, do they not?
If rats are not served at a wedding, everyone in Vietnam gets angry.
That is true.
It is an ethnic custom.
So perhaps there is an ethnic minority that eats bats.
Still, the bat theory has become extremely suspicious.
This essay continues.
The Self-Destruction of Rogue State Xi Jinping’s China Has Begun! (WAC BUNKO 320)
Masahiro Miyazaki
WAC