Read the News in Reverse — The Reality of China’s Anti-Japan Propaganda
By examining reports on China’s crackdown on domestic NGOs, this essay exposes how anti-Japan propaganda states operate abroad. It questions funding, political influence, and the silence of Japan’s opposition parties, legal associations, and major media outlets.
There is a commentator who says that news in newspapers and on television should be read in reverse.
2016-08-24
There is a commentator who says that news in newspapers and on television should be read in reverse.
The Chinese government suddenly announced that it would strengthen control over NGOs within China, citing the reason that they were bringing in Western ideas.
I read this news as meaning the reverse, namely that the Chinese government has been providing financial support to NGOs and NPOs within Japan.
Moreover, China is a one-party communist dictatorship for which it would be no exaggeration to say that propaganda strategy is everything.
Its strategy toward Japan, needless to say, consists of dividing the Japanese people, weakening Japan’s national strength, and undermining Japan’s international credibility.
It goes without saying that South Korea, which for seventy years since the war has made anti-Japan propaganda a national policy and continued anti-Japan education, is exactly the same.
On top of that, Japan is a country that has neither a CIA nor an FBI, while they possess both a CIA and an FBI.
Only those who lack even basic thinking ability would believe that the CIA of countries that make anti-Japan propaganda a national policy is not operating in Japan.
It is inconceivable that the CIA of those countries would be doing nothing and merely idling away time in Japan.
On the contrary, it is entirely natural, as an organization, that they would be continuing their activities day and night.
I have pointed out who, exactly, paid the costs for inviting Mozambican farmers to Japan, or for inviting a Norwegian elderly man and sending him on a lecture tour from Okinawa to the Japanese mainland.
Or who, exactly, paid the expenses for repeatedly traveling to Switzerland to carry out frequent tattling activities at a fraudulent organization such as the United Nations (UNESCO) human rights committee.
That is a problem even an elementary school student could solve.
Because they have continued to do such things to other countries, especially to Japan, the Chinese government has begun restricting the activities of NGOs within its own country.
China, the world’s largest human rights–suppressing state, is now further intensifying that pressure.
Why is it that Japan’s opposition parties, the Japan Federation of Bar Associations, and the Asahi Shimbun do not even raise voices of protest, let alone criticism, regarding this matter?
