Drawing on a firsthand experience of criminal deception, this essay examines how even prosecutors can be misled—and why the world so readily accepts false narratives such as the “comfort women,” forced labor, and the Nanjing Massacre. It exposes states and corporations that side with deception for economic gain.

Examples of how the world is easily deceived—such as the so-called comfort women, forced labor, and the Nanjing Massacre—are too numerous to list.
2016-08-25
Thanks to doctors who graduated from Kyoto University’s Faculty of Medicine and to the nurses, to whom I cannot possibly express enough gratitude, I was completely cured and discharged from the hospital in December 2011, after which I visited, together with our company’s executive director, the lawyer mentioned above who hated PCs and the internet.

Even that lawyer, who hated the internet, said regarding the criminal acts connected to searches for “The Turntable of Civilization” and “Akutagawa Kenji,” “This is outrageous. This is not a matter of lawyers or anything like that. You should go to the police immediately and file a criminal complaint. I will write the complaint right now,” and I recall that moment.

I felt that the crime committed this time was even more malicious than the criminal acts at that time.

At that time, although it took more than a year and a half, the detectives did an excellent job and took the case all the way to the prosecutors. However, the prosecutors were easily deceived by forged documents that the criminal had submitted and decided on non-indictment.

If even prosecutors can be deceived, then it is only natural that we ordinary people are easily deceived by those who possess the DNA of “plausible lies” and “bottomless evil.”

Examples of how the world is easily deceived—such as the so-called comfort women, forced labor, and the Nanjing Massacre—are too numerous to list.

This time, only the International Court of Justice was not deceived, but

it is also a fact that there are countries which, for economic reasons, side with “plausible lies” and “bottomless evil.”

They side with them, so to speak, because they are short of money, but it would not be an exaggeration to say that subsidiaries of Google or NTT siding with evil are ultimately doing the same thing.

In their case, greed and irresponsibility are encouraged and amplified under the guise of laws such as the Act on the Protection of Personal Information.

In other words, they are assisting evil, and yet they think of themselves as respectable major corporations.