The Demand That Paralyzed a Nation: “Immediate Nuclear Shutdown” as a Condition for Power
This essay exposes how the demand for an immediate, total shutdown of nuclear power was imposed as a condition for political survival. It traces the actions of Naoto Kan’s final cabinet, Mizuho Fukushima’s ultimatum, and the role of Japanese media, which together cost Japan more than 10 trillion yen in national wealth.
They made it a condition for stepping down that the Diet pass a policy inferior even to that of kindergarten children—namely, the immediate and total shutdown of nuclear power.
2016-08-27
The closing article comes from page four of the January 31 issue of the Sankei Shimbun.
It is no exaggeration to say that people who merely subscribe to the Asahi Shimbun and watch news programs on TV Asahi will never know these facts for the rest of their lives.
Yet this is no laughing matter as a childish tale.
Facts of this kind, which they judge inconvenient for China, have never been reported.
On the other hand, if it serves to abuse Japan, they will leap at it even if it is sheer nonsense, such as the so-called “comfort women” claims.
Naoto Kan, the final prime minister of the Democratic Party administration—raised up by Asahi and so low in quality that it is no exaggeration to call it a traitor cabinet—found himself in a situation where nearly the entire nation wanted his immediate resignation.
At that time, he imposed a strict gag order on all involved, ensuring that information about his company’s acquisition of a renewable energy firm—mainly solar power—would not leak.
While doing so, he went to Fukushima, which had nothing to do with him, carrying a Geiger counter to measure radiation leaks.
He not only had the process featured in weekly magazines but even turned it into a book.
Then he began calling for the shutdown of nuclear power and a shift to solar energy, while urging that Kan—whom nearly all Japanese citizens wanted removed immediately—should persevere.
They went so far as to say he should continue as prime minister indefinitely, thereby ensnaring him.
Jumping eagerly into this was Mizuho Fukushima, who can be called the worst traitor in postwar Japan without exaggeration and who would surely face the utmost wrath of figures such as Nobunaga and Hideyoshi before the King of Hell.
She made it a condition for Kan’s stepping down that the Diet pass a policy inferior even to that of kindergarten children: the immediate and total shutdown of nuclear power.
As a result, in just a few subsequent years, Japan lost more than 10 trillion yen in national wealth.
International capital—aptly described as hyenas—twisted the arm of a kindergarten-level foolish Japan with ease.
Seeing Japan’s vulnerability, they continued to sell crude oil and natural gas (LNG) at more than double the international price under the name of the “Japan premium,” reaping enormous profits at Japan’s expense.
The cruelty of Japanese media—led by NHK Osaka and Asahi—which broadcast only reporting designed to steer the public toward anti-nuclear policies whose origins and results were both abysmal, is beyond description.
“They said Germany declared a nuclear shutdown too,” they argue.
Failing to notice that the country which committed Nazi atrocities is merely filled with superficial moralists.
If one watches the audience at the outdoor concert in Germany featuring Metropolitan Opera stars such as Anna Netrebko, which I introduced previously, the correctness of my argument becomes clear.
So-called cultural figures, whose statements follow instructions so closely that it is no exaggeration to say they are under the influence of the CIA of China and South Korea, are simply repeating what they are told.
People who live by subscribing to Asahi and watching the reporting of its television networks are, without exaggeration, perfectly brainwashed by the CIA of China and South Korea.
