An article excerpted from SAPIO and reported by ZAKZAK in 2016 reveals an internal Chinese PLA strategy advocating support for Japan’s domestic anti-nuclear movements. This essay exposes a coordinated structure involving the United Nations, activist groups, China, South Korea, and Japanese media, aimed at keeping Japan politically constrained on the global stage.

2016-09-10
The following is an article published on ZAKZAK, excerpted from the September issue of the monthly magazine SAPIO.
All emphasis except for the headline, and all text marked with asterisks, is mine.

An Internal PLA Document Advocates “Supporting Anti-Nuclear Forces Within Japan.”

This title alone already proves that my criticism of the anti-nuclear movement is entirely correct.

The document concludes by stating that, as a future countermeasure against Japan’s nuclear armament, China should closely monitor developments in Japan’s nuclear policy and oppose Japan’s nuclearization through every possible means, including actions taken via the United Nations.
At the UN General Assembly last October, China’s disarmament ambassador Fu Cong claimed that Japan possesses nuclear materials equivalent to more than one thousand nuclear warheads, criticizing Japan for creating serious risks from the standpoint of nuclear security and non-proliferation.
This statement can also be understood as part of China’s strategy to block Japan’s nuclear options.

What is particularly noteworthy is the phrase “supporting anti-nuclear forces within Japan.”
The document asserts that anti-nuclear positions and voices in Japan have established a certain social foundation, and that appropriate support should be provided to civilian anti-nuclear organizations.
This is, quite clearly, an act of what China itself routinely condemns as “interference in internal affairs.”

As I have pointed out, when Japan resumed economic aid to Africa, so-called civic groups immediately brought a Mozambican farmer to Japan and claimed—through a major feature on TBS’s News 23—that Japanese aid had deprived him of his land, a story that any rational person would instantly recognize as dubious.

These civic groups, which repeatedly travel to UN human rights bodies to attack Japan, appear to be extremely well-funded, and I have also addressed the question of where that funding originates.

The construction of comfort woman statues in Freiburg is likewise synchronized with UN human rights rhetoric.
The United Nations, civic groups, South Korea, and China together constitute a single package of schemes designed to keep Japan in the position of a “political prisoner” within the international community.

The media outlets that have sided with or been manipulated by this structure are the Asahi Shimbun, the Mainichi Shimbun, the Tokyo Shimbun, and their affiliated television networks.
NHK, too, must deeply reflect on how often it has aligned itself with this trend.

Despite the fact that Japan, alongside the United States, has provided overwhelmingly large financial contributions to the United Nations—effectively covering staff salaries and operational costs—there is no other country in the world that has been treated with such contempt while remaining silent.
It was the Asahi Shimbun and so-called cultural elites who created this absurd and foolish situation.

Japan must become a nation that cuts down evil without delay.
That is nothing more than what is naturally required.
To cut down pseudo-moralism and the domestic evils that exploit it.
I am convinced that this is an indispensable condition for Japan to lead the world alongside the United States.

To be continued.