The past of residents in Japan is hidden by the delusional “forced abduction” theory. Why did the myth of forced abduction arise?

There is no space for a decent paper, so there is no reason to tell the truth. 
October 7, 2015 
This month’s issue of Sound Argument, a monthly magazine, is also full of truths entirely unknown to those who subscribe to Asahi or Mainichi and live only to watch TV Asahi or TBS news programs.
However, the price is 780 yen. 
On the other hand, Asahi fills about half of its limited space with advertisements similar to those found in sports newspapers, but the monthly fee is approximately 5,000 yen. 
The following is from p.178-p.187, from the work of Mr. Nangyu Abe, a researcher of Korean issues. 
Mr. Nangyu Abe was Born in 1939 in Fukuoka Prefecture. He graduated from Kogakuin University. He was a senior researcher at the Chemical Technology Research Institute of the former Ministry of International Trade and Industry, Agency of Industrial Science and Technology. After retiring in 2000, he served as Director of the Tsukuba Management Office of the Chemical Technology Strategy Promotion Organization until 2003. His major is mining treatment technology. His books include “Summary of the Tsukuba Research School,” and he co-authored “Military Industrialization of North Korea” and “Research on Postwar Japan-North Korea Relations.” Preparations are being made to establish the “Communist Trade Museum.” 
*The reader should realize that his efforts also 100% prove the correctness of my thesis. 
The emphasis in black, other than the title, is mine. 

World Heritage Sites Desecrated by Anti-Japanese People in China and South Korea. 
The past of residents in Japan is hidden by the delusional “forced abduction” theory. 
Why did the myth of forced abduction arise? 
People who crossed the Genkai Sea after the war 
Following Japanese military comfort women, “wartime conscription” has emerged as a historical issue between Japan and South Korea. 
This problem was once called “forced recruitment” and is remembered as “barbaric acts of imperial Japan.” 
As the actual situation has been clarified and the image of it as “barbaric” has been refuted, fewer people now refer to it as “forced recruitment,” and more people refer to it as “forced labor.” 
In any case, wartime conscription becomes a source of tension between Japan and South Korea because there is a deep-rooted memory of this theory that “forced recruitment = barbaric acts.” 
In 1968, at a snack bar in Shizuoka Prefecture, a second-generation Korean living in Japan, Kwon Hyi-ro, shot and killed two debt-collecting gang members and barricaded himself in an inn in the Sumata Gorge hot springs in the same prefecture. 
When Kwon demanded an apology from a current police officer who had made discriminatory remarks against South Koreans residing in Japan as a condition for the release of the hostages, the incident was widely covered by the media as a “problem of discrimination against Koreans.” Domestically, movement groups and people called intellectuals began supporting Kwon Hye-ro.
Even though Kwon Hye-ro killed the two men with a rifle, he was spared capital punishment at trial.   
The incident greatly impacted the subsequent Korean resident movement in Japan. 
The biggest one was the creation of the myth that “Korean residents in Japan have always been discriminated against, and that the root of that discrimination was “forced abduction” by Japan before the war.” 
It promotes the image that they were brought to Japan in the same way as black people who were brought to America as enslaved people from the African continent.  
This article continues.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

CAPTCHA