This essay examines how Japanese broadcast media continue to feature Kang Sang-jung, despite long-standing concerns, revealing how so-called “press freedom” has been distorted by pseudo-moralism and pseudo-Marxism, a reality that the international community should no longer ignore.
2017-06-02
In a genuine essay written by Masayuki Takayama, the one and only journalist of the postwar world, published in the current issue of the monthly magazine Sound Argument, there was a passage concerning Kang Sang-jung, a man who calls himself a scholar and whose dubious nature I was the first in Japan to point out.
I was astonished that he still appears on television news programs, and that there are broadcasting stations that continue to invite him.
Paradoxically speaking, it should be said that the time has come for the United Nations to know that freedom of the press in Japan has gone too far, or rather, that it has been manipulated by pseudo-moralism and pseudo-Marxism.
Omitted preceding text.
On the previous week’s Sunday Morning, Kang Sang-jung appeared.
This man also goes by the name Tetsuo Nagano, but his nationality is Korean.
And yet he says things like “we.”
He speaks of constitutionalism while pretending to be Japanese, and declared that the way Abe presented his constitutional revision proposal was “unconstitutional.”
It is exactly the same as Asahi’s assertions.
In such cases, he should say, “This is a quotation.”
And when speaking about another country, it is the proper manner of a foreigner to speak with respect toward that country.