Why did Donald Trump deliberately enter the World Economic Forum in Davos.
This essay analyzes the structure of Davos as a sanctuary of pseudo-moralism.
It explains China’s strategic exploitation of Western moral weakness.
It also clarifies why Japanese media avoided translating the core of Trump’s speech.
What Trump delivered in Davos was not provocation, but truth.

Why did Trump go to Davos at all.
The answer is not political calculation.
It was necessity.

The World Economic Forum, known as the Davos meeting, is publicly described as a place where global economic issues are discussed.
In reality, it has transformed into a forum where policies are justified through moral language.
Climate.
Environment.
Human rights.
Diversity.
In this space, economic rationality and national sovereignty are treated as secondary.
What matters is whether a policy appears morally virtuous.

The country that has most clearly understood this structure is China.
China knows that Western advanced societies are extremely vulnerable to pseudo-moral arguments.
The moment policies are framed as being for the planet or for humanity, critical thinking collapses.
China has systematically exploited this weakness through COP, Davos, and United Nations institutions.

When I learned that the Davos meeting is organized by Klaus Schwab.
I transcended it.
A conference of this scale and continuity cannot exist without enormous financial support.
The largest and most consistent source of that support has been China.
This is not a conspiracy theory.
It is structural fact.

Donald Trump is fundamentally incompatible with Davos.
Nation.
Industry.
Employment.
Sovereignty.
These are the values he prioritizes.
They directly contradict Davos-style moralism.

And yet, he deliberately went there.
There was only one reason.

Inside this so-called sanctuary, it was necessary to speak the truth.

Trump did not go to persuade Davos.
He went to expose it.

Due to copyright restrictions, the full transcript of his speech cannot be reproduced verbatim.
However, its core meaning is unmistakable.

He rejected the unquestioned glorification of renewable energy.
He attacked wind power as economically inefficient.
He pointed out its dependence on subsidies.
He emphasized its instability.
He stated clearly that it destroys landscapes and wildlife.
Most importantly, he refused to accept the destruction of industry and employment in the name of moral virtue.

This was not emotional rhetoric.
It was structural criticism.

Japanese mainstream media reduced his speech to a caricature.
They reported only that Trump was skeptical of climate change.
What they did not translate was his rejection of pseudo-moralism itself.
They did not convey his defense of industry.
They did not convey his concept of national responsibility.

The reason is simple.
Japanese media institutions themselves exist inside the same moral framework as Davos.
To translate Trump accurately would have meant undermining their own ideological foundation.

Trump did not seek approval in Davos.
He fulfilled a role.

At the very center of pseudo-moralism, he spoke the language of reality.
That act alone revealed the true nature of the forum.

I do not deny the importance of environmental protection.
What I reject is the moment when morality becomes a tool to manipulate civilization.

China understands this mechanism perfectly.
Trump entered the sanctuary and spoke the truth.
That is the essence of his Davos speech.

This essay is not a verbatim reproduction of Trump’s speech.
It is a faithful reconstruction of its core meaning.
What was never translated in Japan is preserved here.