The Park Geun-hye Reports That Proved My Paper 100% Correct — Exposing Asahi Shimbun
News regarding President Park Geun-hye in October 2016 fully validated an earlier paper I released to the world.
This essay dissects Asahi Shimbun’s editorials to reveal the true cause of Japan–Korea tensions and media distortion.
The news about the true nature of President Park Geun-hye yesterday proved 100 percent the correctness of a paper I previously released to the world.
2016-10-26
The news concerning the true state of President Park Geun-hye yesterday proved one hundred percent the correctness of the paper I had earlier disseminated globally.
For the sake of the Japanese people and the world, I will once again broadcast it to the world.
This is my critique of an article written in a serialized column of Asahi Shimbun on September 4, 2015, by Tetsuya Hakoda, in charge of international editorials.
The passages in quotation marks are his article. The text from the asterisks to the asterisks is mine.
“Summer, burdened with many turning points, is about to pass. In August, the mind of South Korean President Park Geun-hye could hardly have been at ease, because of the Abe Statement marking seventy years since the war.”
On that day, I had not read this opening. If this were an editorial written by a Korean journalist, there would be no issue. The problem is that this was written by a person at the core of Asahi Shimbun, a newspaper regarded externally as representing Japan, someone embodying the newspaper’s ideology. To discerning readers, the conclusion is instantly clear—this is precisely why Japan–Korea relations deteriorated.
“The statement followed the Abe administration’s ‘disregard for Korea’ line.”
It is now a historical fact that the fabricated comfort women issue spread worldwide by Asahi Shimbun worsened Japan–Korea relations. Even so, Prime Minister Abe Shinzo has tried, as a politician, to improve relations. That does not, of course, mean conceding to attacks based on absurd lies. From Japan’s perspective, suppressing justified anger toward Asahi within the realities of politics—as I have repeatedly noted—Abe is a rare realist, a person who sees reality straight, free from distorted ideology. To see reality straight, one must view history straight as well, free of distortion. Hence the excellence of the statement. Yet it is no exaggeration to say that all of these hardships were brought about by Asahi Shimbun. This article by a core Asahi journalist, showing not even a trace of remorse for the grave crimes committed against Japan and its people, tells us everything about Asahi.
“Nevertheless, in his speech at the ceremony celebrating seventy years since liberation from colonial rule the next day, Park expressed expectations for Japan’s future efforts and offered a certain evaluation.”
Anyone would be astonished to learn that this was written not by a Korean but by a Japanese journalist at the heart of Asahi.
“The personalities of the two leaders are similar. In particular, their strong egos make matters complicated.”
What kind of person is this man? Any decent person would be appalled. He is proving one hundred percent the correctness of the definition I was the first in the world to articulate regarding what sort of people they are.
“On this point, Park, who enjoys a certain reputation domestically, appeared this time to have shown the more ‘mature’ response.”
This man places Prime Minister Abe, a true statesman worthy of the Nobel Prize as I have often stated, on the same level—or even below—Park Geun-hye, who neither knows nor recognizes the shame of tattletale diplomacy. One can only stand speechless.
“It was the narrow and inward-looking diplomacy on both sides that created today’s dismal relations.”
At this point, mere astonishment is no longer enough. Hakoda, today’s miserable relations were created by the fabrications you spread worldwide, which people raised under outright Nazi-like education by Syngman Rhee’s followers or under North Korean influence have used as prime anti-Japanese propaganda. With ‘bottomless malice’ and ‘plausible lies,’ they have relentlessly attacked Japan and its people across the globe. The Japanese people—among the gentlest and most humble in the world—have finally reached the end of their patience, yet Hakoda does not notice or understand this. It is truly frightening. At the same time, his article clearly shows that Asahi has not reflected in any way on its fabricated comfort women reporting.
“The narrow and inward-looking diplomacy on both sides.”
Such malicious individuals, utterly unaware of what they are, dare to lecture the Japanese government. Even so, a newspaper that allowed such a shoddy and grotesque reporter to lecture a nation that remains the world’s second-largest economic power and in which the Turntable of Civilization turns as a divine providence has monopolized Japan’s media. Japan and its people must no longer permit this monopoly. Without a moment’s delay, they must be made to take responsibility for the comfort women reporting and to place apology and factual explanation advertisements, as Asahi Shimbun, in leading newspapers worldwide. The stage at which their errors could be ignored has long since passed.
