A dialogue examining how the Chinese Communist Party and global capital allegedly shape media, politics, and public opinion. It explores the influence of Chinese money on major media, the true nature of U.S.–China confrontation, and shifts in global power dynamics.

2019-01-07
Some senior officials of the Chinese Communist Party have fled to the United States, hiding billions of dollars in accounts under false names or converting them into real estate under the names of their mistresses.
Can Chinese money continue to provide enough funding to keep major media such as The New York Times bound to it? That remains questionable.
A chapter published on 2018-11-02 under this title is now ranking high in Ameba search results.
The following is a continuation of the previous chapter.

A War to Crush the Chinese Communist Party Government

Kawazoe
Before talking about organizations, I believe that giant capitalists themselves are power, and their “will” creates and elevates politicians, manipulates organizations and groups connected to voting blocs, controls media, and ultimately moves global public opinion, indoctrinating people’s minds.
Whether it is the CPI mentioned by Takayama or remnants of the Comintern, what enables organizational strength and human resources is, first and foremost, capital power.
Why are nationalist politicians and conservative activists globally weak?
Because they receive almost no support from giant capitalists.
Why did the CCP’s operations penetrate so deeply and widely into the United States?
Because with “red, opaque massive money” and personnel, they have worked on the political, governmental, business, and academic spheres of America.

Takayama
When Trump says “fake media,” does he mean media bought by China?

Kawazoe
Buying media is one obvious method, but by purchasing large amounts of stock in advertising companies and sending Communist Party members in as directors, indirect control becomes possible.
The greatest reason why the truth about China, which has been steeped in genocide, is no longer exposed by major global media skilled at humanitarian posturing is precisely the power of that red, filthy money.
And major media are, broadly speaking, Marxist comrades as well.
The American political world probably believed it maintained a clear master-servant China-gate relationship, as Takayama mentioned earlier.
However, since the Clinton presidency and the Jiang Zemin era, relations deepened and the hierarchy gradually reversed.
From their days in Arkansas, the Clintons were already deeply entangled in China-gate.
Xi Jinping’s China considers itself the suzerain of the world.
Not Pax Britannica, but a sense of Pax China.

Takayama
To prevent that from spreading further, the Trump administration stood up.

Kawazoe
It is described as a U.S.–China trade war, but that is a minimization.
It can be seen as the start of a war to crush the CCP government.
It may continue for five or even ten years.
The United Kingdom is the same.
In May 2016, at a garden party, Queen Elizabeth referred to Xi Jinping’s delegation that had visited the previous year as “rude.”
The BBC deliberately allowed her words to be heard.
I thought, ah, the gong has sounded.
In Commonwealth Australia, the daughter-in-law of former Prime Minister Turnbull’s son was said to be of Chinese origin with a father close to Jiang Zemin, and pro-China remarks stood out.
However, recently Australia has shifted into a China-warning mode.

Takayama
I wonder whether Chinese money can continue to provide enough funds to bind media such as The New York Times.
Perhaps the yuan will soon plunge and Chinese money will dry up.

Kawazoe
Senior CCP officials may be fleeing to the United States, but they hide billions of dollars in false-name accounts or convert them into real estate under mistresses’ names.
I wonder if those could be tracked down and aggressively frozen by presidential orders.

To be continued.