This essay sharply questions the responsibility of Asahi Shimbun and the Democratic Party over radiation standards, the enormous cost of decontamination policy, and the reporting that followed the Fukushima accident.
Through criticism of the LNT hypothesis and facts surrounding reactor design, it exposes the deception embedded in Japan’s nuclear coverage.

2019-06-08
Based on such groundless data, they spend trillions of yen decontaminating even fields and forests.
The responsibility of the Democratic Party and Asahi that set this in motion is grave.

This is a chapter I posted on 2018-07-21 under the title, “Professor Calabrese of the University of Massachusetts and Dr. Sumihiko Sakamoto of Tohoku University have demonstrated that radiation, on the contrary, is effective in the treatment of cancer and dementia.”
The following is a continuation of the previous chapter.
All emphasis in the text, except for the heading, is mine.
Asahi and the Democratic Party set up the lie.
The same is true of contaminated soil.
The standard is the radiation dose corresponding to the annual allowable limit for the human body of 1 millisievert, but this standard is 100 percent a sham.
It resulted from the United States, which first possessed nuclear weapons, propagating Hermann Muller’s theory that “radiation destroys genes and produces deformities” in order to stir up fear of nuclear power, and that theory is now regarded as a delusion.
In fact, Professor Calabrese of the University of Massachusetts and Dr. Sumihiko Sakamoto of Tohoku University, among others, have demonstrated that radiation doses which, according to Muller’s theory, would be fatal, are on the contrary effective in the treatment of cancer and dementia.
Based on such groundless data, they spend trillions of yen decontaminating even fields and forests.
The responsibility of the Democratic Party and Asahi that set this in motion is grave.
There are still more lies engineered by Asahi.
Immediately after that accident, Asahi editorial writer Keiji Takeuchi concealed the fact that the reactor had been manufactured by the American company GE, and wrote that “at the time of construction it was assumed that core meltdown would not occur, so no release valve was equipped on the reactor,” and that it was “introduced only at last under pressure from developments overseas,” making it sound as though it were a defective reactor made in Japan.
In reality, GE installed a reactor without a gas release valve and disclosed no know-how whatsoever.
TEPCO, taking the Three Mile Island accident in the United States seriously, installed the release valve on its own initiative.
To be continued.