Japan’s Mass Media Give Me Back My Time My Money These 20 Years—The Internet Breaking the Information Monopoly and the Meaning of Democracy

2010-9-6
Give me back the time I spent on you at least forty-some years give me back my subscription fees

How appalling even if keeping Kan as prime minister is your newspaper’s consensus is this not far too appalling have you still not shed the disposition that destroyed the country by repeatedly relaying Imperial General Headquarters announcements

Thinking I should make sure, I asked another acquaintance, not the one mentioned earlier… a mild-mannered 30-year-old woman brought up as a sheltered young lady of course entirely apolitical this time for some reason she apparently felt she simply had to go and see despite getting caught in a huge crowd where her feet were stepped on and people pushed and jostled

When I told her the opinion-poll figures in this morning’s Asahi she looked blank for a moment not knowing what I meant after taking a little time to understand she said Prime Minister Kan had about 3 percent

The businessman whom the acquaintance mentioned earlier met at the scene is someone I have known for a long time working like an ant every day
He built a large company a man devoted entirely to his work the very picture of earnestness

Apparently he had come thinking “I’ve got to see Ozawa at least…”
“People in Osaka prefer Ichiro Ozawa…” naturally his reaction to this morning’s newspaper was “Unbelievable!”

The front page reflects the concerted stance of Japan’s mass media today if I may say one thing among the people surveyed in what they call their opinion polls
Are there workers who work all their lives and earn 5 million yen a year?

Does it not include only the likes of influential local and district figures and the elite?
Even setting that aside, is that article on yesterday’s joint campaign rally in the city news section acceptable?
Such a vast crowd… ordinary men and women of all ages gathered in Umeda

This was not a celebration of a Hanshin Tigers championship or anything of the kind it was a joint campaign rally of a political party to decide the prime minister
If you do not accurately convey the scene there who had the advantage what kind of journalism can you call it?

This is what it means to be “utterly appalled.”

The acquaintance at the beginning is 30 and therefore well versed in computers
The day before yesterday she told me that the Democratic Party was broadcasting live online
So I watched the Shinjuku broadcast that day before going to bed.

While watching the live broadcast at home I thought this is real democracy direct democracy
It is not the unilateral one-way information from the mass media the information they monopolize that we watch and read I thought that a democracy of citizen participation was beginning.

It made me imagine that this must have been what it was like when Caesar and others spoke in the public squares of ancient Rome
Of course, the sight of this nationwide internet broadcast participants at the scene participants watching on television all tweeting at once
Goes beyond anything in ancient Rome the advance of civilization’s tools and through it the incomparably greater deepening and spread of democracy

Japan’s mass media give me back my time give me back my money give me back these 20 years
Your reporting is far too appalling if the acquaintance at the beginning had not told me about the online broadcast and I had not gone to the scene
I too would have been on the verge of swallowing everything you said
A chill runs down my spine I shudder.

Since you continued to deceive even me it was only natural
That democracy had not been fully realized in our country even 60 years after the war today I became convinced of this.

Everyone who watched online and my two acquaintances who were at the scene must have had Naoto Kan’s expression of disappointment burned into their eyes and left in their hearts

Those in the established media probably dismiss the internet and do not even watch it
But this time alone your scheme became visible through it

I if you continue with your methods up to now the unchecked relaying of government-supplied information obtained through privileged press clubs or continue writing articles that follow the wishes of those in power

I think your downfall is just around the corner
There can be no such thing as democracy that ignores the will of the people

Because democracy exists only in raising our voices without cease day by day unceasingly and overcoming reality

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Please enter the result of the calculation above.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.