The following is part of why I am looking for a lawyer in this column.

The following is part of why I am looking for a lawyer in this column.
This site (Goo) is operated by NTT Resonant (merged with Docomo=NTT in July 2023 and now managed by Docomo), although the search results and access analysis graphs have been constantly falsified by the above criminals, something as outrageous as this Ameba incident would never happen on Goo.
Another criminal act of search obstruction is that the criminals mentioned above routinely repeat the criminal act of making searches for the chapters I have posted on this site and referring to completely unrelated chapters of this site in the past.
As for the act of tampering at the beginning of this article, I would like to present an actual example in this column tomorrow, and if any of our readers around the world can identify the modus operandi, please let Docomo know.
The latter technique at the beginning of this article seems to be a Path Traversal or Directory Traversal attack.
*Path Traversal or Directory Traversal is one of the attacks on web applications.
An attacker gains access to unintended filesystems, including source code and critical system settings, by manipulating file path values.
“../” is usually used for file path operations, but absolute paths may also be used.
To enter a file path, the attacker identifies the operating system being used and then attempts to enter malformed inputs.
https://www.sompocybersecurity.com/

In the case of this site, I noticed that the prohibited words in the hashtags were strange.
One day, the following notice appeared at the top of the editorial page regarding violations of the terms and conditions.
Four of the more than 150,000 articles I continue to send out have been suspended from publication because they violate the terms and conditions. If you wish to republish the articles, please correct the relevant sections and contact us.”
All four articles were either quotations from articles posted online or the full text of the quotes.
All four were articles about Kiyomi Tsujimoto that had appeared on the Internet.
These articles were not the main topic of this column, and I found them while searching and checking related matters.
Even though the articles were suspended in this column, they were still available on the Internet, so I left them as they were.
I had thought about deleting it sooner or later.
I deleted one of them the other night, but then I realized something.
I should save it as an example of what a decent company would naturally do when suing Ameba.
So, I left the other three cases as they were.

I have learned something very keenly from this case.
There is a world of difference between NTT (NTT Resonant, which operated Goo for many years, was merged into Docomo in July of this year, so the current operating company is Docomo=NTT) and CyberAgent.
What I think is outrageous or unforgivable is that CyberAgent, Inc. has done such an absurd thing to me, a long-time paying member; while doing such a shameful thing, they keep sending me e-mails daily with information about Ameba picks or new articles by someone who follows me.
I have not canceled my paid membership yet because it would be fine if the case is restored.

The next is about my relationship with lawyers.
Until Japan’s economy was rattled by restrictions on total lending in 1990 and the onset of deflation, there was no such thing as a court case.
When I was managing a corporate group that paid over 17 billion yen in taxes to the Japanese government in just ten years at its peak, a friend who was close to me at the time introduced me to a lawyer who was his high school classmate.
Since then, he had been our group’s legal advisor, and we had been paying him considerable consulting fees for a small to medium-sized company.
He was a former judge.
The world was changing rapidly, and we were encountering court cases in which the money we had lent someone needed to be returned.
As an advisory lawyer, I had shared drinks with him and was very close to him personally.
However, when it came time to request a court case, he was challenged to use it.
I was told by a friend who introduced me to him that this was all his clients’ impression of him as if to defend themselves.
Perhaps it was because he was a former judge, but when he asked us to write a complaint or when we were in court, he gave us a series of instructions that said, “Just say what the conclusion is.
The trial’s progress was the only priority, and the anger and thoughts of the plaintiffs were almost wholly ignored.
The judge would ask for the beginning and end of the case but would check with us later to make sure.
Naturally, this caused a lot of stress. What in the world was the purpose of the trial, I wondered.
The total volume control also severely affected our company, and our advisory contract was terminated.

Several years later, when we managed to get our business back on track, a case ended up in court.
At that time, I did not have a close lawyer, so I was introduced to one by a business manager with whom I had a close relationship.
This lawyer was a former prosecutor.
This person was also a “tell me your conclusion” type.
Going to trial, or having to go to trial, is very stressful.
It is also stressful in terms of money and time.

From the beginning, this lawyer said, “I hate the Internet, and I hate looking at it. Some young people know what they are talking about, so please ask someone who knows what they are talking about.
So, I can’t request this case.

I was very shocked on 8/18 regarding this case.
From July 2010 until that day, I had written more than 150,000 papers for Japan and the world without compensation, and in an instant, CyberAgent erased them.

Therefore, I want to do this case with a smile and have fun.
We are seeking a lawyer who can enjoy prosecuting this case with us.
We will be crowdfunding for the court costs of this case at the same time, so we need your help.
I do not need any money except for the legal fees, so the cooperation is, for example, to guarantee the solicitation account to the lawyer.
Of course, we will have no choice if the crowdfunding is unsuccessful.
In any case, we are looking for an attorney who can come up with a reasonable price for the litigation costs.
Of course, we will not delay payment of the costs in any way.

Please contact us at
Phone: 09010251441
Email: naraharuo2013@gmail.com
My name is Mikio Kisara

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

CAPTCHA