Why was Kuribayashi lieutenant general’s garrison insisted on there?

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.
I am emphasizing the sentence except for the headline. Korean seal providential help
Is the Korean Peninsula turbulent or stagnating? There was not a very good time.
The exception was the ruling of the Japanese empress for 36 years; the fields had grown, slavery was abolished, and the people spent the days filled with forgetting bursting.
But as soon as it is over, it starts a war in the family.
The Japanese thought it was a troubling habit. Still, Nakano, a certainty of the Asahi Shimbun editorial committee, said, ‘There is a tremendous misunderstanding that Japan has a great responsibility for that war.’ And he introduced the strange view in the column the other day.
Column criticizes the way of writing a newspaper of the time, ‘Gyeongseong fall.’ It is not Gyeongseong. It will be Seoul. Why insensitive to reporting with the colonial-era designation?
I looked doubtful whether getting so angry was such a problem, and Gyeongseong fell.
The troops dispatched by the United Nations will be decided against this North Korean invasion.
MacArthur became the top, and the ‘U.S. occupation forces stationed in Japan’ emerged.
U.S. military weapons ammunition was ‘landed at Kobe port, up to Maizuru by freight car’ Japanese brought.
He blames Japan for deep involvement, but what should we do? Yes. In this way, Nakano sets up a Suita case, in which ‘Koreans in Japan et al.’ Attacked the base of the ammunition transport train, Suita control station, threw a fire bowl, and injured the National Railways staff in a mass of flames.
A column says, ‘It is because the life of 1,000 countrymen is saved if delaying a military train for 1 hour’ of the Koreans in Japan added to a clamor.
In short, it seems to be able to do an anti-war movement like Beheiren, but the countryman that saves ammunition out of the U.N. army in North Korea’s military.
Why do Japanese occupation people have to oppose U.N. forces? That side cannot see at all.
Nakano intently praises the behavior of Koreans in Japan who ran to the sabotage. It isn’t easy to understand, but it is apart from it.
The word ‘Countryman will be saved by delayed by one hour’ in Koreans in Japan sticks in my mind.
IN THIS SUITA CASE, a U.S. army attacked Iwo Jima 1000 kilos south of Tokyo a few years ago.
A battleship and a cruiser, 11 vessels batted a violent bombardment to change the island’s shape for three days; the first team of 30,000 US soldiers landed.
They worried that ‘There are Japanese soldiers we kill,’ but 20,000 garrisons below Lt Kuribayashi battle in the basement and fought well until the last soldier.
The U.S. Army’s schedule of’ annihilation in 5 days’ could not be fulfilled even after 30 days.
Why was Kuribayashi lieutenant general’s garrison insisted on there?
If Iwo Jima goes down, B 29 can override all over Japan as you like with a fighter cover.
Lieutenant Kuribayashi remarks, ‘One day on this island that we protect if our children can live in a safe place for a day, it makes sense.’
Koreans living in Japan are doing that mimicry.
It should stow away if there is the preparation as much as it even and return and fight to a peninsula for North Korea.
You may be thrust into the U.S. military base.
What does it mean to have rampant Japanese people in a safe Japan? Nakano has no interest in that rude.
This draft continues.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

CAPTCHA