A Nobel Prize Fraud: China, Maurice Strong, and the Environmental Deception

A Nobel Prize Fraud: China, Maurice Strong, and the Environmental Deception;
This essay traces the origins of a grand deception in which China, with Maurice Strong and allies, used environmentalism as a pretext to weaken advanced economies and profit from climate schemes. From Anna Louise Strong’s communist propaganda to COP26, the piece reveals how false climate narratives, EV strategies, and carbon-credit scams enriched China while misleading the world.


April 5, 2025
When the world began to scratch its head in confusion, Maurice was wanted for another fraud carried out on the UN stage, and like his aunt before him, fled into China.

January 3, 2024

I am convinced that this chapter must be reread not only by the Japanese people but by people around the world.
At the same time, this essay proves that in today’s world, no one is more deserving of the Nobel Prize in Literature than Masayuki Takayama.

From that time, he and China began a scheme to “use environmental protection as a pretext to weaken the industries of advanced nations and make money off the environment.”

November 21, 2022

The mastermind, China itself, exposed to the whole world the collapse of the lies it had manufactured—this was revealed by the outcome of COP26.

November 16, 2021

“He seemed somewhat unable to reconcile the fact that what he intended as a climate model had been turned into a scam.”
This was the title of the chapter released on October 21, 2021.

The Japanese people—and indeed the people of the entire world—must reread this.
Especially those who make their living in the mass media worldwide, as well as politicians, must read it.
…For from that time, he and China began a scheme to “use environmental protection as a pretext to weaken the industries of advanced nations and make money off the environment”…
And because they still seem blind to the fact that China, the mastermind, revealed the bankruptcy of its own lie with the outcome of COP26.

What follows is from Masayuki Takayama’s serialized column in Shukan Shincho, which concluded with the November 16, 2021 issue.
This essay also proves that he is the one and only journalist in the postwar world.
This essay must be read, not only by all the Japanese people, but by people everywhere.
Emphasis in the body, except for headings, is mine.


A Nobel Prize Fraud

Nebraska is hot by day and cold by night.
The weather changes easily, and so do the people it produces.
One said to represent this is Anna Louise Strong.

After discovering communism at the University of Chicago, she plunged in headlong, impulsively flying off to the Soviet Union.
A bold American woman is useful.
Stalin let her do as she pleased.

Even as famine and purges raged in Ukraine, she saw none of it.
From Moscow, she published an English-language paper singing the praises of communism.

Capricious Anna soon grew interested in Mao Zedong as well.
She met Zhou Enlai in Chongqing and also visited Yan’an.
A document remains today in which Mao ordered Deng Xiaoping to “treat her with courtesy, for she will be good propaganda.”

Whether she liked the treatment or not, in 1958 Anna abandoned the Soviet Union and settled in Beijing.
Believing China to be the true ideal of communism, she chose to stay.
That same year, Mao launched the “Great Leap Forward,” starving 30 million people to death.
At the same time, in Tibet, he ordered the massacre of tens of thousands resisting Chinese invasion.

While touring Lhasa, where the blood had not yet dried, Anna declared:
“In China, criminals are neither executed nor exiled.”
It was a brazen falsehood worthy of a communist, but it was said to have been uttered for the sake of her nephew, Maurice Strong.

Thanks to her, Maurice—born in Canada—penetrated deeply into China’s ruling elite.
Two years after her death, with China’s backing just after it entered the UN, Maurice became Secretary-General of the UN Conference on the Human Environment.
From that time, he and China began a scheme to “use environmental protection as a pretext to weaken the industries of advanced nations and make money off the environment.”

The trigger was the “radiation balance” theory announced at Princeton University at the time.
Measurements showed that Earth’s heat radiation exceeded the incoming solar energy, suggesting an average of minus 17°C.
The fact that Earth was actually at +15°C was attributed to the 0.03% of CO₂ in the atmosphere.
The supposed conclusion: if CO₂ increased, warming would accelerate rapidly.

For the Chinese and Maurice, that alone was enough to concoct a fraud.
Industrial nations that emitted much CO₂ would be made to buy emission credits from developing nations.
But China—responsible for one-third of the world’s emissions—was classified as a developing country, exempted from the scheme.
It was a special privilege for the architects of the scam.

Maurice then brought in Al Gore.
Global warming was declared a reality: polar bears would vanish, snow would disappear from Kilimanjaro.
They dramatized it in An Inconvenient Truth.

Immediately, Maurice and China rolled out phase two:
“Cars must become electric, producing no CO₂.”
EVs run on batteries.
These require rare earth metals, especially neodymium—found only in Inner Mongolia.
It would mean exclusive profit for China.

And when people asked, “But EVs need huge amounts of electricity,” the reply was: “We have Chinese-made solar panels ready.”
Thus Toyota’s finely honed internal combustion engines were declared obsolete.
With rare metals and cheap motors, China aimed to dominate the world.

Yet long years have passed since Al Gore’s prophecies.
Polar bears have increased in number.
Snow still falls on Kilimanjaro.

By the time people began to wonder, Maurice was wanted for another UN-based fraud, and like his aunt, fled to China.
The con man who exploited the environment said nothing more, passing into the grave in silence.

At the same time, Princeton senior researcher Syukuro Manabe received the Nobel Prize in Physics.
When told the award was “for climate modeling,” he candidly said, “That’s what it’s for? Surprising.”
He seemed somewhat unable to reconcile the fact that what he intended as a climate model had been turned into the basis for a global fraud.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

CAPTCHA


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.