Japan’s postwar discourse, shaped by exam-driven elites and Marxist academia, collapses under lived experience.
A single week in Kyoto is enough to reveal its profound emptiness.

Their foolishness is something that can be understood simply by spending one week in Kyoto.
2016-01-03
To put it plainly, those who ranked in the middle to lower half of my classmates, mere exam-oriented achievers, entered Japanese universities dominated by Marxist economics and went on to become lawyers or employees of the Asahi Shimbun.
They fail to comprehend a reality in which so-called right-wing groups, rooted in gangs largely composed of resident Koreans,
mount loudspeakers on luxury vehicles and scatter noise through city streets with a level of vulgarity and coarseness that stands in direct opposition to the Japanese value of refinement.
Japan, one of the world’s foremost democratic and rule-of-law nations, cannot crack down on them.
This is because freedom of expression is respected above all else.
Such freedom is unimaginable in countries like China or Russia.
Yet, astonishingly, the Japan Federation of Bar Associations has joined forces with so-called civic groups
and has continued to slander Japan on international stages such as the UN Human Rights Council,
portraying the country as a hub of hate speech and one of the world’s most racist nations.
The Asahi Shimbun has supported this narrative both openly and behind the scenes.
These facts have now been fully exposed.
I am referring to those who, as mere exam-oriented students, believed without question that a constitution hastily copied by GHQ in just two weeks from Western documents was entirely correct,
and that it alone created modern Japan and the Japanese people,
a belief fitting for the simplistic thinking of figures such as Kenzaburō Ōe, the writers who followed him, and celebrities like Sayuri Yoshinaga.
Their foolishness can be grasped simply by spending one week in Kyoto.
As for them, I will teach them, for the first time in human history, what true, nuclear-level hate speech actually is.
That, however, will be written in the next chapter.