Was the Wuhan Virus Naturally Occurring? Masayuki Takayama’s Suspicions Concerning Shi Zhengli and the P4 Laboratory
Prompted by a doctor’s detailed remarks on NHK News, the author deepens his suspicion that the Wuhan virus was not naturally occurring. Referring to Masayuki Takayama’s arguments, a paper by the University of Delhi, Shi Zhengli of the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s P4 laboratory, similarities to HIV, and reported recurrence cases, the article discusses suspicions that the virus may have been a man-made biological weapon.
March 19, 2020
That is why it was recognized as a new type.
The characteristic of the new type was that the method by which the protrusions of the virus attach themselves to human cells was exactly like that of HIV, and the DNA sequence there was also exactly alike.
Tonight, on NHK News, I heard for the first time a detailed exchange with a doctor who is treating patients.
I became convinced that this Wuhan virus is not naturally occurring.
The person taught to us by Masayuki Takayama, the one and only journalist in the postwar world, and the person pointed to early on by a paper published by the University of Delhi in India.
That “person” implicitly referred to Shi Zhengli, a researcher at the “P4” laboratory of the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
At the University of North Carolina in the United States, she was conducting research precisely on chimeric viruses made by inserting other genes into coronaviruses.
After returning to China, she continued that research at “P4.”
Incidentally, “P4” is located 16 kilometers from the Wuhan seafood market.
Not only India, but also a professor at a university in Guangzhou, one of China’s own, supports the “leak” theory, though from another “Wuhan disease center.”
The virus of Wuhan pneumonia resembles that of SARS.
That is why, at first, it was thought that infection had come from bats or pangolins sold at the Wuhan seafood market.
However, its symptoms differ from SARS, and its infectious power is also stronger.
That is why it was recognized as a new type.
The characteristic of the new type was that the method by which the protrusions of the virus attach themselves to human cells was exactly like that of HIV, and the DNA sequence there was also exactly alike.
That is the reason why AIDS drugs suddenly began to be used.
There are even more mysterious points.
For example, in Guangzhou, there was a report that “14 percent of recovered patients relapsed.”
A Chinese resident in Osaka also relapsed after being completely cured and discharged from the hospital.
When human beings recover from an illness, they do not catch the same disease again.
That is because, whether it is a pathogenic bacterium or a virus, antibodies against it are produced in the body.
This is common sense in the medical world.
That is why immune and antibody therapies, such as using the plasma of recovered people, had been established.
But it seems that this does not work with the Wuhan virus.
When something happens that does not occur in nature, suspicion arises that it may be “some kind of biological weapon made by human hands.”
Mr. Takayama.
Your suspicion is probably 100 percent true.
Shi Zhengli is the greatest criminal of the postwar era, and China, which had her conduct research for biological and chemical weapons, has become one of the greatest criminal states in human history.
