Published on July 17, 2019.
This essay criticizes the decline of Japanese universities, professors, and students through a Sankei Shimbun article about a survey of Kinki University and South Korean students regarding the Japan-South Korea agreement on the comfort women issue.
It examines the reality of Japanese university education being infiltrated by anti-Japanese propaganda through postwar anti-Japanese education, the presence of Chinese and Korean professors, and the issue of government subsidies to private universities.

July 17, 2019.
Does this mean that university professors are so thoroughly a gathering of left-wing infantile-disease patients and a gathering of traitors?
The article proved that this is exactly the case.
Speaking of the previous chapter, the other day a strange article appeared on the front page of the Sankei Shimbun.
That the Sankei Shimbun, too, is not monolithic was made clear at the time of the Levchenko affair, when there was also a Soviet spy inside the Sankei Shimbun.
What is strange about this article is, first of all, that… with this, I say with anger that Kinki University has reverted to being the old foolish Kinki University.
As I have already written, there are an astonishing number of Korean and Chinese professors at Japanese universities, beginning with the University of Tokyo.
What do they want to teach students by appointing as professors people who grew up in countries that have continued anti-Japanese education throughout the postwar period?
Do they want to brainwash students with anti-Japanese propaganda?
Does this mean that university professors are so thoroughly a gathering of left-wing infantile-disease patients and a gathering of traitors?
The article proved that this is exactly the case.
A Kinki University professor with a Korean name conducted a survey of Kinki University students and South Korean university students.
The article said that, as a result, 80 percent in South Korea and more than 40 percent among Kinki University students answered that the Japanese government should also reconsider the Japan-South Korea agreement on the comfort women issue.
The person who wrote the article was a female reporter.
To begin with, do Kinki University students have the qualifications to be university students?
Would it not have been more correct to direct the four years they spend calling themselves university students toward labor?
What value is there in university students who do not even notice, or do not know, that their own country is being branded with infamy?
They have not a penny’s worth of value.
How foolish it is that even such a university receives large amounts of private-school subsidies from the Japanese state, from taxpayers’ money.