Why Does TBS Broadcast Anti-Japanese Reports? — A Former TBS Employee’s Monologue on the Internal Transformation of Television Stations

Published on July 13, 2019.
Based on a text introduced as the monologue of a former TBS employee, this article records the alleged background behind the persistent biased reporting of TBS, TV Asahi, and NHK, including hiring practices, internal personnel decisions, and changes in editorial direction.

July 13, 2019
Do you know why TBS broadcasts anti-Japanese reports?
A former TBS employee’s monologue.
“Let me tell you how our station ended up this way.”
A chapter published on September 17, 2018, under the title “It reveals why the biased reporting of NHK, TBS, and TV Asahi is so terrible and persistent,” is ranked in the real-time top 10 and was also ranked second for consecutive days in yesterday’s top 50.
The following is a chapter I published in Japan on June 22, 2017, under the title “A detailed account of how TBS, after establishing a no-examination Zainichi Korean hiring quota under the skillful pressure of Chongryon, was gradually taken over by Zainichi Koreans.”
It is precisely in this chapter that all the reasons are perfectly present as to why the reporting of TBS, TV Asahi, and NHK engages in such terrible editing and such blatant anti-Japanese reporting.
It reveals why the biased reporting of NHK, TBS, and TV Asahi is so terrible and persistent.
I somewhat regret that I should have repeatedly published this chapter many times.
Since it is a truth that the Japanese people did not know, there is no way the world could know it either.
However, for example, the reality of cities in the United States that have installed comfort women statues and the reality revealed by this chapter are exactly the same.
In other words, this is a chapter that shows that the same kind of operations are being carried out all over the world, and that the fools and traitors ruled by them exist all over the world.
Do you know why TBS broadcasts anti-Japanese reports?
A former TBS employee’s monologue.
“Let me tell you how our station ended up this way.”
It is written in detail how TBS, after establishing a no-examination Zainichi Korean hiring quota under the skillful pressure of Chongryon, was gradually taken over by Zainichi Koreans.
(1) From the 1960s onward.
Soon after television broadcasting began, Chongryon repeatedly carried out protest actions close to intimidation against the company and the homes of its executives over minor wording issues during broadcasts, such as referring to the “Democratic People’s Republic of Korea” as “North Korea.”
They even went so far as to come to people’s homes with an appearance that resembled gangsters.
As a “settlement” for the protest actions, a “Zainichi quota” was secretly established in hiring.
Hiring without entrance examinations, mainly of the children of Chongryon executives, continued every year, with only interviews in form.
The station side “asked” Chongryon to keep the secret agreement on the Zainichi quota confidential from the supervising government agency, thereby giving Chongryon even more leverage, and through such amateurish and naive responses, the station gradually became unable to move.
(2) From the 1970s onward.
It was an insane era in which public opinion applauded as long as the government was attacked.
Management executives who mistook the “anti-Japanese programs” of Zainichi employees for “the struggle of the pen against power” and “investigative reporting” actively promoted Zainichi employees within the company.
It was all very well to state idealistic views such as, “There must be no discrimination in promotion between Japanese employees and Zainichi employees,” but looking at the results, it was naive not to discriminate in promotion.
Zainichi employees who were promoted to section chief and department head thoroughly carried out reverse-discrimination personnel practices, irrationally favoring naturalized second-generation Zainichi employees.
Japanese employees who objected were thoroughly marked and removed from the front lines of program production, being sent to sales, general affairs, and the like.
(3) From the 1980s to the 1990s.
Promoted Zainichi employees came to occupy decisive posts, such as producers of major news programs and heads of news bureaus.
The program News 23, which brought in the Zainichi Korean editor-in-chief of a certain left-wing weekly magazine, Chikushi Tetsuya, as its anchor, achieved high ratings through the support of viewers of the baby-boomer generation who had devoted themselves to student movements during their university days.
In the 1989 House of Councillors election, they thoroughly supported the “Doi Socialist Party” and the “Madonna boom” through an “anti-consumption tax campaign.”
They reported daily on Prime Minister Uno’s scandal, persistently called the Zainichi Korean party leader of the Socialist Party “Otaka-san,” and openly supported the Socialist Party.
The Socialist Party won a landslide victory.
They reported it with emotion, saying, “The mountain has moved.”
(4) From the 1990s to the 2000s.
Scandals broke out repeatedly that could have denied its very existence as a news organization, including biased reporting, fabricated reporting, and providing interview information to specific forces.
Asahi Shimbun and its affiliated TV Asahi, which are also called “left-wing” like us, tended to have many reports that, if anything, reflected “Beijing’s will,” and their methods, for better or worse, were meticulous and calculating.
By contrast, in our case, almost all of the many troubles that occurred during this period were related to the Korean Peninsula.
The contents of the scandals, beginning with the Aum incident, in which assistance was given to a Korean cult that carried out terrorism, were crude and haphazard.
With the economic slump after the collapse of the bubble economy, advertising revenue, already under severe pressure, came to depend heavily on “consumer finance” and “pachinko.”
In the truest sense, our broadcasting station is one operated by Zainichi Koreans with Zainichi Korean funds.
I think that after 2005, programs will be produced in an even more blatant form to “create” Zainichi stars.
In this way, each TV station continued every year to hire Zainichi Koreans without entrance examinations.
Of course, Zainichi Koreans acquired Japanese family registers and entered under Japanese names.
They are what are called “Japanese impersonators.”
Those Zainichi Korean employees were promoted, and from 1980 onward they began to take decisive positions of power, such as producers of major news programs and heads of news bureaus.
In other words, it means that each TV station has been taken over by Zainichi Koreans.
As proof of this, the fabrication of the Korean Wave boom and the force-feeding of Korean Wave television have been carried out.
TBS, which had felt fear, continued thereafter to hire Zainichi Koreans every year without entrance examinations.
Having gotten a taste of success from this intimidation, Chongryon threatened television stations and newspaper companies in the same way as TBS, finding pretexts and forcing them to establish Zainichi quotas.
NHK is the same.
In this way, Japan’s television stations came to be controlled by Zainichi Koreans posing as Japanese.
The Zainichi who have controlled the Japanese media are “worms inside the body of the lion” in Japanese society.
The worms that live inside the body of the lion and receive its benefits instead eat the lion’s flesh and eventually bring the lion to death.
In other words, they are those who cause harm while being inside an organization, and those who repay kindness with enmity.
Why do they not understand that if the lion dies, the worms will also die?
The media controlled by Zainichi are intensifying movements to stir up fear of war, drag down the Abe administration, and force it to resign.
And then the president of TBS made a startling statement at the company entrance ceremony.
If the president of TBS holds and expresses such thoughts, Japan is finished.
Unless he becomes a true Japanese manager with common sense, he is disqualified as the head of a news organization.
Can this still be called a news organization?