China’s Brazen Media Criticism of Japan: COVID-19 and the Abnormal Anti-Japan Conduct of China and South Korea
Based on a Sankei Shimbun article from February 2020, this piece examines how Chinese state media, despite China being the source of the novel coronavirus outbreak, criticized Japan and South Korea’s epidemic measures. It also discusses South Korea’s attacks over Fukushima treated water, VANK’s anti-Japan posters, and the shared pattern of bottomless evil and plausible lies in China and South Korea.
February 26, 2020
After reading this article, I thought that China is not so much an abnormal country as a country of madmen.
The only country equal to them is probably South Korea.
The following is from today’s Sankei Shimbun.
After reading this article, I thought that China is not so much an abnormal country as a country of madmen.
The only country equal to them is probably South Korea.
The treated water from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant contains tritium at a level found in the natural world and poses no problem whatsoever.
South Korea releases treated water containing 100 times as much tritium as this treated water.
South Korea, and the Asahi Shimbun and NHK that have gone along with it, have continued to report Fukushima’s treated water as contaminated water, but it is South Korea’s treated water that is at a level that may properly be called contaminated water.
Nevertheless, VANK, an unbelievable anti-Japan organization formed by the South Korean government,
and when South Korea, the Asahi Shimbun, and others attack the Japanese government, one of the words they like to use is “Nazi,”
but VANK itself is precisely Nazi-like.
In order to degrade Japan and to prevent the success of the Tokyo Olympics, VANK created three kinds of laughable posters.
They were posters using the Tokyo Olympic mark, depicting Mount Fuji, and showing a runner in radiation protective clothing running with the Olympic torch.
Not only that, South Korea even announced that, because Japanese agricultural products were supposedly contaminated with radiation and dangerous, it would bring South Korean food into the South Korean athletes’ village, have South Korean chefs prepare it, and not use any Japanese food at all.
And yet, as soon as South Korea learned that strawberries and sweet potatoes, which Japan had painstakingly improved and created through breeding and had registered as varieties, were highly popular in Southeast Asia, including Singapore and Hong Kong, it stole them from Japan, cultivated them, and exported them to Singapore and Hong Kong.
Today’s article and South Korea’s behavior clearly prove that they are countries of bottomless evil and plausible lies.
All the people in countries suffering from the viral disaster that came from China will be utterly appalled by the following article.
China has not said a single word of apology to us.
And unbelievably, it is lecturing Japan, a country that is the cleanest in the world and equipped with the finest medical facilities.
China.
You may lecture South Korea, your vassal state, which, like you, both in the past and now, boasts the worst filthiness in the world, as much as you like.
But to lecture Japan means that you are no longer in the realm of human beings.
You are in the realm of beasts.
In Will, released today, Professor Hiroshi Furuta, who is also the world’s foremost expert on Korea, has published a dialogue feature titled, “That Is Ancient Food: If Greater China Is Bats, Lesser China Is Dog Stew.”
He has continued to write arguments that hit the mark about the reality of the Chinese cultural sphere.
“Japan and South Korea’s Measures Are Slow”
Chinese Media Points Out
[Beijing = Yoshiaki Nishimi] Toward Japan, South Korea, and other countries where infections with the novel coronavirus are rapidly spreading, China’s official media, from the country that became the source of infection, is demanding stronger epidemic prevention measures.
In an editorial dated the 25th, the Global Times, affiliated with the People’s Daily, the organ of the Communist Party, argued that responses through “nationwide mobilization” should be considered.
On the other hand, the Chinese government has objected that the border measures of some countries, including the United States, which invoked entry restrictions from China, were “overreactions.”
There is also a view that China’s pressure on countries not to impose travel restrictions brought about the global spread of infection.
The editorial criticized South Korea’s response, saying that restrictions on the operation of public transportation such as subways had not progressed and that “the measures are weak.”
In its editorial on the 24th as well, the newspaper pointed out that the measures taken by Japan, South Korea, and others were “insufficient” and that “their actions are slow.”
The Chinese government-affiliated English-language newspaper China Daily also criticized the measures taken by the authorities in Japan, South Korea, and elsewhere in an editorial dated the 25th, saying that “most are reactive and lack conviction.”
I will teach them that Japan has a proverb: the thief is brazen.
