Professor Yoichi Shimada reveals that a UN Human Rights Council Special Rapporteur received large sums of money from China and other authoritarian regimes. Behind these operations lies IMDAR, which has repeatedly used the UN to attack Japan’s immigration and security policies. From false testimony in the U.S. Senate to the manipulation of Okinawan independence narratives, this article exposes the full structure of the information war targeting Japan.

The shocking facts revealed by Professor Yoichi Shimada of Fukui Prefectural University in the Sankei Shimbun prove beyond doubt that the chapter I published earlier under the title “There are not just one or two governors whose words and actions are incomprehensible for Japanese citizens” was precisely on target.
It has now become clear that Alena Douhan, a Special Rapporteur of the UN Human Rights Council and a professor at Belarusian State University, received a total of 200,000 US dollars from China, as well as funds from multiple other authoritarian regimes.
One of the individuals regularly featured by NHK, a female professor of Korean origin at the Faculty of Law of Aoyama Gakuin University, who has been indoctrinating even her students to criticize and attack Japan’s immigration policies, is in fact one of the central figures of IMDAR, an organization that deliberately traveled to Geneva to organize its activities.
IMDAR is precisely the organization that has repeatedly used this deeply compromised UN Human Rights Council to issue so-called “human rights recommendations” in order to disgrace Japan whenever the opportunity arose.
Until August 2014, I myself had been a regular subscriber to the Asahi Shimbun, AERA, and the Weekly Asahi.
It was Masayuki Takayama, the one and only journalist in the postwar world, who taught me that Sayo Saruta, a female lawyer who could be said without exaggeration to have been manipulating former Okinawa Governor Takeshi Onaga as his advisory counsel, traveled to the United States in order to destroy Japan’s nuclear power industry, and at the US Senate spread the outrageous propaganda that Japan’s nuclear power plants were stockpiling plutonium sufficient to produce thousands of atomic bombs.
This Sayo Saruta is exactly the individual who advanced arguments tantamount to those of a proxy for China, such as the theory of “Okinawan independence.”
She even propagated the absurd claim that Okinawans are a “minority ethnic group.”
The Asahi Shimbun and AERA gleefully published articles supporting her, treating her claims as ideal material for attacking the Japanese government, and thus provided full media backing.
When the late Takeshi Onaga, who could truly be described as someone attempting to sell Okinawa to China, traveled to the United Nations and delivered a speech that was nothing short of treasonous, the person standing behind him was none other than this Sayo Saruta, together with IMDAR and others of the same kind.
Japan, which until August 2014 had been under the intellectual domination of the Asahi Shimbun, was truly a nation with an appallingly lax sense of security.
That foolish legacy continued on and on, and in the end we lost the greatest statesman in postwar Japan.