The Deadly Poison Hidden in the UN’s SDGs: Globalism, Socialism, and Japan’s Sovereignty

The following is a chapter I published on October 31, 2021, under the title “The Deadly Poison Hidden in the SDGs Spread by the UN.”
I am republishing it after correcting typographical errors, paragraphing, and other details.
January 1, 2022: this is one of the essays that must be read not only by the Japanese people but by people throughout the world.
I watched “Kirin ga Kuru” until, midway through, its narrative began to follow NHK’s self-denigrating view of history.
I was watching the episodes that focused on Nobunaga and Nohime.
That was when I first became aware of Haruna Kawaguchi.
I thought she had a genuinely distinctive and wonderful personality.
I searched for information about her and learned that she had grown up on Fukue Island in the Goto Islands and that, even now, she returns there whenever she has free time.
I reflected on how right my intuition had been.
At the height of my business career, a Dentsu employee with whom I was close invited me, for the first time, to visit a certain “kingdom” on Fukue Island in the Goto Islands, in connection with the travel exposition being held in Nagasaki.
I will describe the astonishing experience I had there later.
That same Haruna Kawaguchi was selected to host Kohaku.
So last night, although I did not watch the entire program, I watched a considerable portion of it while doing other things.
Not content with having colored the latter half of “Kirin ga Kuru” with its foolish view of history, NHK last night featured footage of Kawaguchi on Fukue Island and brainwashed her—and the viewers—into becoming believers in the SDGs.
This happened yesterday, December 31, 2021, during NHK’s customary year-end Kohaku Uta Gassen.
All the more reason, therefore, that today, January 1, 2022, New Year’s Day, the Japanese people must read the following genuine essay, especially the passages emphasized in bold.
This column was the first in the world to point out that the UN is a farcical organization, so foolish that it would be no exaggeration to call it the worst in history.
Even an elementary school child can understand that the mere fact that China and Russia are, incredibly, permanent members of the Security Council proves this column correct.
Whenever the other permanent members have attempted to adopt resolutions concerning threats to world peace and security, those two countries have invariably exercised their vetoes.
Meanwhile, China has poured astronomical sums into its military buildup, creating today’s extremely dangerous and unstable world.
The UN has been of absolutely no use in preventing this situation.
This column was also the first in the world to point out that the SDGs are a sham and a Chinese scheme.
The essay by Jason Morgan, an associate professor at Reitaku University, published in the issue of the monthly magazine WiLL released on October 26, demonstrates that this column was right on target about these matters as well.
Essential reading not only for the Japanese people but for people throughout the world.
This genuine essay, which it would be no exaggeration to call one of the finest essays of the twenty-first century, also exposes the indescribable foolishness of the Asahi Shimbun, which has continued to place the UN above Japan, and of the so-called intellectuals who have followed its lead.
The monthly magazine I have been discussing costs only 950 yen, including tax, despite being packed with genuine essays such as this.
Every Japanese person who can read must immediately go to the nearest bookstore to buy it or take out a subscription to benefit from the favorable discounts.
Emphasis within the text, other than the headings, is mine.
The Deadly Poison Hidden in the SDGs Spread by the UN
Environmental protection, eliminating discrimination, realizing a sustainable society… If the SDGs strike a chord with you, beware.
A Gimmick for Introducing Socialism
On January 26, 1948, a man identifying himself as “Jiro Yamaguchi, a doctor from the Tokyo Metropolitan Government’s Epidemic Prevention Section,” entered a branch of the Teikoku Bank in Shiinamachi.
“There has been an outbreak of dysentery around Shiinamachi.
Before GHQ carries out disinfection, please drink this ‘preventive medicine,’” Dr. Yamaguchi instructed the bank staff.
After Dr. Yamaguchi had sixteen staff members drink the “preventive medicine,” ten of them died immediately.
That was because what he had given the Teikoku Bank staff was not “preventive medicine” but a deadly poison.
Far from being a doctor, Jiro Yamaguchi was a terrifying murderer.
A man impersonating a government representative had lied that he was acting in the interests of public health and inflicted terrible harm on ordinary citizens.
In 2021, seventy-three years after that incident, something remarkably similar is taking place.
The “preventive medicine” has become “sustainable development,” and in the name of “protecting the global environment,” the UN, far more terrifying than Jiro Yamaguchi, is trying to make the entire world swallow the deadly poison called “socialism.”
According to the major media in each country that parrot the UN’s slogans, sustainable development promises the planet’s future development and enables countries around the world to advance safely and peacefully, economically, educationally, and politically.
To realize that future, the UN has assembled a number of key terms and is broadcasting them around the world.
These are the “Sustainable Development Goals,” or SDGs.
Will the SDGs really lead to the planet’s development?
The American conservative magazine The New American, which has reported on the “true nature of the UN” for many years, concludes that the SDGs have “nothing to do” with sustainable development.
The magazine reported that the real objective of “Rio+20,” held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in June 2012 as a forum for world leaders to discuss the direction of the economy, society, and environment over the following ten years, was “the socialization of the entire world.”
The SDGs—Sustainable Development Goals—are nothing more than a “Socialism Debut Gimmick”: retaining the same initials in Japanese gives (S) shakaishugi, socialism; (D) dōnyū, introduction; and (G) gimikku, a gimmick or stratagem.
The Hidden Aims of the SDGs
Why can we state unequivocally that the purpose of the SDGs is “the socialization of the entire world”?
Because their predecessor is the “Millennium Development Goals” of 2000, which in turn form part of their own predecessor, “Agenda 21” of 1992.
Agenda 21 depicts the future of a “global society” in which the UN centrally manages humanity to realize a sustainable civilization for the future through measures such as eradicating poverty and combating environmental pollution.
It would be entirely fitting to call it the “Bible of globalism.”
Globalism is socialism in another guise and, like socialism, is based on the idea that elites should control the masses.
When people follow the SDGs, as they do in today’s world, rule by the elites becomes easier.
The SDGs proclaim educational objectives, and beginning in 2005, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, UNESCO, conducted ten years of “education for the SDGs.”
Specifically, this is education aimed at eliminating national sovereignty, private property, freedom of speech, and so on—objectives that socialists have pursued all along.
The end of national sovereignty, the extinction of the Imperial Household, the collapse of the family, the revocation of natural human rights: even without calling it “socialism,” these things are advancing today under the cover of the SDGs.
The Strange Relationship Between the UN and the Chinese Communist Party
The secretary-general of the aforementioned “Rio+20” conference was Sha Zukang, an influential figure in the Chinese Communist Party.
In 2010, Sha Zukang presented the “World Harmony Award,” offered by the World Harmony Foundation, to a man named Chi Haotian.
Chi Haotian is a master of mass slaughter who planned and carried out the Tiananmen massacre.
The day before “Rio+20” opened, Xinhua News Agency, an official media outlet of the Chinese Communist Party, reported the following comment by Sha Zukang:
“China has already achieved excellent results in the field of the SDGs, and there is every possibility that it will become more involved in international SDGs in the future.”
China and the UN seem likely to become increasingly entangled in collusion.
Among Japanese conservatives, China’s takeover of the UN has become common knowledge; but when one considers why China was able to hijack it, the answer begins to seem obvious.
The UN was not originally founded as a forum where the countries of the world could solve global problems.
It was founded as a base for realizing the dream of “global domination” shared by America and the Soviet Union during the Second World War—as well as by many in the Chinese Communist Party and the Kuomintang—and as a base for the socialism and liberal globalism against which Japan had stood.
Anti-Japanese hostility is in the UN’s DNA.
Hijacking such a base is child’s play for China, a “giant of anti-Japanese hostility.”
The UN is considered an international institution, but it is merely a “screen” concealing the presence of America, the Soviet Union, and China, which hold the real power.
The reason Japan has still been unable to become a member of the Security Council, despite excelling in economics, technology, art, literature, and even military affairs—Japan’s armed forces are excellent, even if they are not explicitly recognized in the Constitution—is that the UN continues to hold Japan down.
To achieve the global domination sought by the UN—in other words, a One World Government—Japan, with its emphasis on freedom and democracy, stands in the way; the same is true of Germany, ordinary Americans who insist loudly on human rights, and people throughout the world who are concerned about socialism.
Imposing globalism and socialism on such people from above would provoke resistance, so the SDGs—the gimmick for introducing socialism—were used instead.
The entire world is now cooperating to realize the “world domination through socialism” long imagined by socialists, communists, and American liberal imperialists—exemplified by the racist President Woodrow Wilson and President Franklin Roosevelt, who sought to destroy Japan.
Why Is the UN “Japan’s Enemy”?
The conclusion that the UN is “Japan’s enemy” is not a conspiracy theory.
A September 2020 editorial in the Sankei Shimbun takes a skeptical view of the UN’s purpose.
Of particular concern to Japan are the “enemy state clauses” contained in the UN’s founding documents.
One article in these clauses states that UN member states may invade Japan and Germany, their former enemies, without the approval of the Security Council.
Some argue that the “enemy state clauses” have been rendered ineffective by subsequently adopted charters and other instruments, but that original article has not yet been deleted.
The Sankei Shimbun and the Japanese government point out that if China attempted to use that article to its own advantage, it would have legal justification, making it dangerous.
It is an unmistakable fact that China is now building a majority at the UN by bringing over to its side countries that, as Seki Hei quite rightly describes them, hardly deserve to be called nations… thug states… most of them small, impoverished countries or dictatorships.
From what I have watched, I am genuinely appalled that NHK and TV Tokyo blindly report this situation on their flagship news programs, saying, for example, that more countries support China.
This is because China’s steady efforts to build a majority at the UN are nothing other than preparations for attacking Japan in the near future.
This is an extremely grave warning that this column is the first in the world to sound.
Yet the Japanese have a favorable image of such a UN, and, as if to symbolize this, the United Nations University, its flagship university, is located in Tokyo.
The UN’s decision to establish its flagship university in Tokyo was by no means arbitrary: it made Japan a base for its propaganda activities precisely because the Japanese trust their government and public officials.
Why do the Japanese have a favorable image of it?
I believe it is because they value the spirit of fair play, strict adherence to rules, and the role of public officials.
Of course, valuing fair play and strict adherence to rules is a good thing.
In many countries around the world, however, “public officials”—that is, most people in government—are involved in corruption.
In my own country, America, government corruption is limited at the local level, as it is in Japan, but the central government is corrupt to the core.
One could almost say that whenever the central government acts, it invariably does so for the private interests of someone within it.
In other words, the enemy of ordinary Americans is not China or Russia, but Washington, D.C.
People who trust public officials are regarded as fools.
The Japanese, however, trust their government so much that in 1948, when a man suddenly entered a bank saying, “I am from the government,” and told them, “Drink this,” some believed that “government representative” and drank a deadly poison.
The Population Reduction Plan
As China takes over the UN, UNESCO, too, is yielding to Chinese pressure.
The Chinese government, which uses the UN for propaganda, has had documents concerning such historical fabrications as the Nanjing Massacre entered into the Memory of the World Register.
China has even said that it wants the “Chairman Mao Memorial Hall,” where Mao Zedong’s body is enshrined, inscribed as a World Cultural Heritage site.
Now that not only UNESCO but the UN itself is becoming part of the Belt and Road Initiative, Japan must not casually accept the Trojan horse of the SDGs that the UN seeks to implement.
Under the ideology of “international peace,” the UN is actually ruling the world while proclaiming cleverly crafted slogans.
It is precisely when such an organization puts forward a pleasant-sounding slogan like the SDGs that we must be especially vigilant.
Incidentally, introducing the SDGs in Japan, which is desperately battling its declining birthrate, is profoundly contradictory.
This is because globalism’s highest priority is to drastically reduce the world’s population.
The “Kissinger Report,” a white paper on “population issues” prepared by the U.S. federal government in 1974, contains the shocking argument that there are too many “people of color” in the world and that their numbers should therefore be reduced as much as possible.
The ideas of Kissinger, the king of globalism, express the essence of the SDGs.
Unaware of this, Japanese universities, the government, and other institutions are proclaiming the SDGs and preparing to bring about great suffering.
Considering all of this, it becomes clear why former NATO Secretary-General Javier Solana, a socialist, has praised the SDGs as “the next Great Leap Forward.”
Sweep Away the SDGs!
As The New American points out, when the UN announced the SDGs, it used the reassuring phrase “Exclude no one in humanity”; put another way, however, this means that “every human being must obey these directives.”
Then UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon openly declared: “We must transform the world through these goals.
Every organization, institution, and so forth throughout the world must become fit for this new and great purpose.”
When Agenda 21 was unveiled in Rio de Janeiro in 1992, then U.S. President George Bush urged his fellow citizens: “The American people must pledge allegiance to the sacred principles of Agenda 21.”
The new world order advocated by Bush is not a new order for the American people or the Japanese people.
The SDGs are a scheme to bring the entire world under socialism, devised for the benefit of global elites.
We must not simply do as we are told by an anti-Japanese, anti-American organization like the UN.
We should sweep away the UN, restore the full sovereignty of the Japanese nation, and give the interests of the Japanese people the highest priority.
In short, before drinking a “preventive medicine” suddenly presented to us, we must thoroughly investigate who “Jiro Yamaguchi” really is.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Please enter the result of the calculation above.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.